Extra Credit Blog :)

A) The 5 "sexiest" theories in my opinion in social psychology are:

1. Social Facilitation just because it explains so much of why some things happen to me. Plus, research with cockroaches! Not only did they use cockroaches for some studies, but they even made little roach audience boxes for the spectator roaches. How could social facilitation not be on the list?
2. Affective forecasting because I think it is one of the most interesting things that we have learned about and has really changed how I think about my future emotions. It also makes me feel a little better that lottery winners are not any happier than me in the long run. :) I also loved reading about it in my book project book, Stumbling on Happiness.
3. Spotlight effect because it saves you on a bad hair day and it is one of those things that my friends are probably annoyed about hearing all the time.
4. Self-fulfilling prophesy because it is one of those things that still amazes me every time I read about it. I thought that the article that we had to read that was about self-fulfilling prophesy in the classroom was one of the most interesting articles from this year, and it really shows how social psychology can be applied in so many different situations.
5. Triangular theory of love because it is a theory about love! I had no idea that there was so much interesting research on love and relationships. I also like theories and concepts that are really broken down and organized into different parts (Kind of like the two routes to persuasion with the source, message, and audience variables).
--I forgot to leave a spot for cognitive dissonance! It's one of those theories that I will never forget because I think it is that interesting. Not only is the idea that we change our attitudes just so it matches our attitudes interesting, but also the fact that we really don't realize this is the reason for our attitude. I also thought the grasshopper study was funny. :)

B) My 5 favorite social psychologists are:

1. MIlgram because although his research on obedience would be unethical today and really made me cringe when we watched that video, it was super cool to read about and I almost wish we could do stuff like that today.
2. Zanjonc because he has the best name ever and I really liked his research on social facilitation...it's those roaches!!
3. Cialdini because of all of his research on compliance. I love that I now have valid ways of getting people to do what I want them to do. :) I also really liked the idea that he went "undercover" to learn more about what he was researching.
4. Gilbert because affective forecasting and anchoring and adjustment will be concepts that I will never forget and because of Stumbling on Happiness!
5. Stanovich because I really like the vividness effect and loved reading his book last year.
--Bonus favorite social psychologist: Dr. G!! Because we wouldn't know any of this stuff without her!!! :)

Blog #9-Social facilitation

Social facilitation is when the presence of others enhances performance on easy or familiar tasks and reduces performance on hard or unfamiliar tasks (Zajon, Heingartner, & Herman, 1969). Furthermore, the evaluation apprehension theory states that this process is not completely universal, but only holds true when in the presence of others who are evaluating the performance (Geen, 1991; Henchy & Glass, 1968). Working on math problems in front of a class, presenting projects, and even playing video games have caused me to feel the effects of social facilitation. However, the two examples that I can remember clearly in my mind in which I experienced a negative effect and a positive effect was during a volleyball game at camp and during a piano performance.

In high school I would always go with my church youth group to summer camp, Super Summer, either as a camper or a camp counselor. Unfortunately, with summer camp comes sports, and I am not incredibly coordinated when it comes to playing them. I always at least try, but eventually it is better for everyone if I just watch and cheer on the team than actually play. :) After arriving at this particular camp, everyone is split up from their youth groups and put into a small group (usually 8-12 people who are in your grade) for the week so that you are not with anyone you have ever met before (very nerve-racking at first, but it was fun). Later in the week, all of the groups compete against each other in games and sports. One of the rotations that we had to play my first year at this camp was a weird form of volleyball in which there were four nets set up like an axis and you had to play against three other teams. I'm already bad at playing volleyball so putting me in an even more unfamiliar situation was a bad idea. Not only was I worried about playing the game, but I was worried about being watched by the people in my group who I had just met and the small audience of people who were either just watching or waiting for their team's next rotation. To make a long story short I completely missed the ball that was coming toward me and end up getting hit in the face. Now, I'm not always that bad at volleyball; it was just a time when social facilitation effects were not in my favor.

Another activity that I participated in before coming to college was playing the piano. I was not amazing, but I think it is safe to say that I was pretty good. Before competitions and recitals, one of my piano teachers would make us play the pieces to be performed repeatedly and eventually learn them so that we could play without music. I loved playing the piano and although at first they were difficult, after practicing for so long the pieces of music that I would have to perform became familiar and easy. Most performances were either played in front of parents, other performers, and/or judges, but social facilitation benefited me because I remember that I always felt that I played my best when performing than when alone.

Geen, R. G. (1991). Social motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 377-399.

Henchy, T., & Glass, D. C. (1968). Evaluation apprehension and the social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 446-454.

Zajonc, R. B., Heingartner, A., & Herman, E. M. (1969). Social enhancement and impairment of performance in the cockroach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 703-709.

Demonstrate-A-Concept Blog

The video would not upload here...so, the link for the video on youtube is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGriWFyye_o

When making social judgments, we often use heuristics, or cognitive shortcuts, to speed up processing and making decisions (Gilovich et al., 2002; Kahneman et al., 1982; Nisbett & Ross, 1980). One of the mental shortcuts demonstrated by Tversky and Kahneman (1973) is the availability heuristic, or the tendency to judge the likelihood of an event based on how quickly or easily an example comes to mind. They asked participants if words that start with the letter r or words that have r as their third letter are more common. They found that participants used the availability heuristic and incorrectly assumed that because words that start with the letter r came to mind more quickly, they were more common. One of the consequences of the availability heuristic is the vividness effect, or the tendency for us to rely on vivid personal testimonies, which come to mind easily, rather than on more reliable information like statistics (Stanovich, 2001).

To demonstrate the concept of the vividness effect, I asked eight people around campus about whether or not they would buy AT&T’s Samsung Sync SGH-A707 if they needed a new phone. Specifically, I informed them that the phone was rated as one of the top three best cell phones by Consumer Reports. Furthermore, I explained that this rating was based on user reports and results from its in-house testing laboratory. Next, I explained that I dislike the phone and have had a lot of issues with it. Consistent with the vividness effect, I expected most people to be more influenced by my personal testimony rather than the reliable information from Consumer Reports, and say that they would not purchase the phone.

The first person I asked is a good friend, and she said that she would not buy the phone at all. After I explained what the blog was about, she told me that her decision was based on my experiences. Although she has never actually used the phone, she has heard me voice my negative opinions about it before. This does illustrate the vividness effect, but I thought that it would be interesting to ask people who had never heard me voice opinions about the phone to see if I could receive the same results.

The next three people that I interviewed had very interesting responses. The second person said that she would consider purchasing the phone. Moreover, she explained that she knows people who have the phone and like it. I thought that it was interesting that although she said she would consider purchasing it, she was still basing her judgments in part on personal testimonies. The next person said that she would consider purchasing the phone. After talking to her further, she said that she is currently a research methods student and is therefore more aware of the importance of reliable information. The fourth person said that she would not purchase the phone. Unfortunately, my camera died before I could get further feedback on film about why she would not purchase it, but she did say that she always tends to trust people more than statistics. I thought that this is particularly interesting and clearly illustrates the vividness effect.

When interviewing the last four people, I decided that it would be more valuable to ask for feedback on why they decided to purchase or not purchase the phone. The fifth and sixth people interviewed said that they would not purchase the phone because they would use person testimonies, specifically my negative experiences, when making decisions about purchasing the phone. In addition, the seventh person said that she always tends to rely on information from others when making decisions rather than reliable, statistical information. Interestingly, the final person interviewed said that she would probably buy the phone because she values the information from Consumer Reports.

Taken together, the interviews conducted seemed to show that some people fall prey to the vividness effect by relying on personal testimonies rather than on more reliable information. After each interview I explained the vividness effect to the interviewees, and although some thought it was interesting, some insisted that they would still rely on personal experiences. It is interesting to note that two of the three people who said that they would consider purchasing the phone are science majors, and four of the five people who said that they would not purchase the phone are humanity majors. I thing that it would be interesting to read research on the vividness effect and what factors influence who falls prey to it more often. After all the interviews I thought it would be funny to ask my dad what he thought about the phone because he has seen firsthand the difficulties that my mom and I have had with it. Surprisingly, he decided to rely on consumer reports!

Gilovich, T., Grifin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.

Stanovich, K. E. (2001). How to think straight about psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Blog #8-That's-Not-All Technique

One of the techniques used to influence people to comply is the that's-not-all technique. Burger (1986) studied this technique, or the idea that compliance increases when the person influencing someone makes a large request before asking for what they really want, by selling cupcakes to customers. Specifically, in one condition he sold the cupcakes for 75 cents, and in the other condition he told customers that the cupcakes were a dollar but had just been reduced to 75 cents. In his experiment, the same cupcakes for the same price in the second condition sold more than those in the first condition (sales increased from 44 to 73 percent). Burger (1986) demonstrated that the larger first request (dollar cupcake) makes the second request (75 cent cupcake) look smaller than it actually is.

As soon as I read about this in the text, I thought of the days when I was little and lots of my family would get together, spring clean their houses, and have one large garage sell. The night before we would set everything up and label everything with colored price tags (each family within the family would have their own color). I use to think it was so funny that on some of the large furniture items (like couches, beds, or dressers) they would tape the price on, mark it out with a large red marker, and write a new price on the bottom. When I asked my mom about it, she said that it would make people think that they were getting a deal. I thought that it was interesting that my mom, who has never taken psychology, demonstrated the that's-not-all technique without even realizing it!

Burger, J. M. (1986). Increasing compliance by improving the deal: The that's-not-all technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 277-283.

Blog #7- Cognitive Dissonance

The cognitive dissonance theory indicates that we experience psychological tension when engaging in behavior that conflicts with our attitudes (Festinger, 1957). Aronson and Mills (1959) studied cognitive dissonance in terms of effort. That is, they hypothesized that we justify our effort by altering our attitude because dissonance can be experienced when there is a conflict between the amount of effort we put forth and the outcome of that effort. Aronson and Mills (1959) found that participants in a condition where they had to put forth more effort altered their attitudes about their condition and rated it more positively. An example of justifying effort that I remember is when my family went to visit my brother after he finished boot camp.

Most of the men in my family have been in the military. Fortunately, my parents encourage my brother and I to strive for something that will make us happy and have never pushed us to join the military for family tradition. My brother never showed an interest in joining until after his senior year of high school. We had him all packed and ready to go to Texas Tech (literally) when he announced that he was going to join to Army. He said that he needed to serve his country and was not ready to go to school because he needed more time to find himself. He chose the Army because they were the only branch that you could join for just two years (which is funny because in my family it's ok if you don't join the military, but there is an unspoken rule that you had better join the Navy if you do). Not long after his graduation from high school he left for boot camp in Kentucky.

My parents and I went up to Kentucky to see my brother graduate from boot camp, and he was able to give us a little tour of the base to show us where he slept, ate, and trained. Normally, my brother is pretty outgoing, doesn't like cleaning, and hates meaningless work. However, one of the things that I remember most from his tour was how proud he was of all the hard work he had done no matter how small. He even took us into his barracks and showed off the bathroom that he and a few other guys had cleaned. Although boot camp is known to be a difficult and intense experience, my brother took all the effort that he put in those long weeks and ended up rating the experience as very favorable.

I learned how to add photos!


Aronson, E. & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177-181.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanfor, CA: Stanford University Press.

Blog #6-Central and Peripheral Routes

Petty and Cacioppo (1986) explained in their dual-process model of persuasion that there are two routes that individuals can take when processing a message. They described that the central route to persuasion is taken by an individual who thinks very carefully about the information presented and is influenced by the strength or quality of an argument. In addition, they described that the peripheral route to persuasion is taken by an individual who thinks little about the information presented and is influenced by other simple cues.

After reading the chapter on what influences which route we use to process information, I began to notice when and where I have used each one. The first example that came to mind of central route was when my parents started looking for houses before we moved back to The Woodlands. In research examining advertising effectiveness, it was found that individuals with high involvement used the central route to persuasion and were influenced the most about the strength of the argument presented (Petty, Cacioppo, & Schumann, 1983). Obviously, because my parents were looking to purchase a house they were highly involved and were very interested in the quality of information about the areas and houses that they were about to buy into. Before moving from and back to The Woodlands we took what people said about the different areas without much thought or argument; however, while preparing to move back into The Woodlands it took a lot more research and quality information about different areas to convince us where exactly we should live. The second example actually resembles the advertising effectiveness research previously discussed (Petty et al., 1983). They manipulated the strength of argument by providing participants with either strong arguments for a disposable razor which included scientific information or weak arguments which included beauty information. I recently went with one of my good friends to Wal-mart, and among other things she really needed to buy a new razor. While helping her to chose which razor she should buy I found myself taking the peripheral route by paying more attention to the colors (for some reason I really wanted her to buy a purple one) and attractiveness of the packaging. Fortunately, she tuned me out and payed more attention to cost and quality of the razors.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. The Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 136-146

Blog #5-Attitudes

Ajzen (1991) explained in his theory of planned behavior that attitudes are not the only determinants of our behavior and influence on our intentions, but include subjective norms and our perceived control of the behavior. Specifically on subjective norms, his theory explains that perceptions of what others think we should do can influence our behavior in a direction that is consistent with or opposite of our attitude. That is, we can be pressured to act in ways that go against our feelings toward something or someone.

One of the pretty strong, negative attitudes that I have is toward fast-food restaurants. I like eating at sandwich or burrito type places (Subway/Chipotle), but when I do go to the tradition fast-food places like McDonald's or Sonic I only get drinks or shakes. I believe that this attitude was shaped during middle and high school by my family, particularly my father, and some close friends. My strong dislike for eating at fast-food restaurants is not because I'm some crazy health nut (believe me...I'm not...we can eat pretty unhealthy around my house), I just never felt comfortable with the cleanliness of those places and I always get a weird greasy feeling after eating there.

A simple example of how subjective norms have influenced my behavior in a way that was not consistent with my attitudes would be during every single church youth-group trip that I took in high school. Traveling anywhere with a large group of teens who are on a budget normally means eating at fast-food places. Despite my attitudes toward this dining option, they did not predict my behavior because I ate and I ate happily. In my mind, what everyone else wanted to do, grab a quick burger and fries, was more important than my attitudes towards food. Thankfully we occasionally were able to stop at a subway or Chick-fil-A (a fast food place that has chicken salad sandwiches!) along the way which always made me happy. :)

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

Participant Observer Blog

The implicit personality theory is the relationships that we hold among particular traits; we assume that when an individual has a certain trait that they also have a network of other traits (Asch, 1946). There are also implicit personality theories about groups. For example, entity theorists, or people who view groups as having particular fixed traits, are more likely to use stereotypes than incremental theorists, or people who view groups as having less fixed traits (Levy et al., 1998). The Implicit Association Test (IAT) was designed to study how the unconscious mind works and how it diverges from the conscious mind. Its goal is to determine the private attitudes or preferences that we are hesitant to share and/or unconscious of. The way that the IAT achieves this is by requiring participants to rapidly respond to matching tasks. The more that two concepts are associated, the easier and faster that it should be to match them. Generally, it is easier to sort a liked concept with a positive word and a disliked concept with a negative word.

In their study on the IAT, Nosek, Greenwald, and Banaji (2005) explained the five steps included in the test. First, two topic categories will appear on opposite sides of the screen (i.e., Young and Old). The participant must then sort the pictures that appear on the screen as fast as they can into these categories by pressing the key that corresponds to the category in which it belongs. When taking the IAT online, the key the “e” key corresponds with one category and the “i” with the other. Second, the user must sort items into two polar opposite attribution categories (i.e., happy, friendly for good and horrible, angry for bad). Third, the first two steps are combined. That is, a topic category and attribution category are paired and the participant is asked to sort pictures and items (i.e., a picture of a white male or the word angry for the category White/Bad). Fourth and similar to the first step, participant must again sort pictures into their respected topic categories. However, the key that corresponds to the category is switched. Finally, the third step is repeated with the topic category and attribution category pairs switched (i.e., a picture of a white male or the word happy for the category White/Good).

The first test that I chose to take was the Young-Old IAT. The results suggest that I have a slight automatic preference for old compared to young, which corresponds with 4% of the web respondents. I feel that this result is consistent with my conscious beliefs and attitudes, and that it may be as a result of the environment of my upbringing. Newcomb (1934) found in his study of political attitudes of women who came from conservative backgrounds and encountered more liberal views in college, that attitudes are often formed as a result of our environment. The women in his study gradually became more liberal as they progressed through school. I have always been comfortable around older people and have enjoyed spending time with them. In high school, a couple of my friends and I would play music for a senior citizen center and often play games of chicken foot or bingo with them. I also was very close to my grandparents before they died, particularly my grandfather who would pick me up every day after school during my sophomore and junior year of high school (I had early release and no car). Perhaps if I was immersed in an atmosphere where older people were seen as bad and frustrating my attitude would begin to change.

I decided to take the Young-Old IAT again to see if I could change my results and was able to change them to a strong automatic preference for young compared to old. It did take me longer to sort the words and pictures into categories, but I just kept repeating in my head “old bad, old bad, old bad” whenever a picture of an older person was presented. This resembles the idea that attitudes can be formed through the process of learning. Staats and Staats (1958) presented college students with pairs of a nation’s name and either very positive or negative word. They found that when repeatedly presented with these pairs, the students later evaluated the nations more positively or negatively consistent with the words that were attributed to the nation’s name. Although I was able to change my result, I do not think that this ability discredits the IAT. If a person knows how the test works and tries hard enough then they can get the result that they desire; however, if a person takes the test with an open mind they may be able to learn more about their unconscious attitudes.

The second test that I chose to take was the Family-Career IAT. My responses suggested a moderate association of male with career and female with family. Although I expected to have an association of male with career and female with family, I was somewhat surprised about the strength of that association. It took some thought about why I might make this association, but I believe that it once again is a result of my upbringing. My parents have always followed the standard view in the Bible that the man is the head of the household. In addition, my family moved around a lot and this was always due to my father’s career. Moreover, his military career resulted in his absence for long periods of time during my childhood in which my mother was the primary caretaker. Receiving the result on this test did make me think more about prejudices and stereotypes. I began to explore my feelings toward women having a career because it seemed inconsistent with my behavior of going to college so that I could eventually have a career. Several reasons came to mind why I might make the association but not hold a prejudice. First, my father is the head of the house but my parents have always worked together as a team. My father always consults my mother whenever decisions are to be made, and they have always had a mutual respect for each other. Additionally, both of my parents have careers and have always insisted that I receive a good education so that I am able to have a career. There was never a question in our house of whether or not I went to college because my parents wanted me to be able to take care of myself. Although my family would always be there to support me, I was brought up to be prepared for any circumstance and to not assume that I would always have someone else to depend on.

Taking the IAT to explore my unconscious stereotypes and associations was an interesting experience. I think that it helped me to learn more about myself and how experiences have shaped the attitudes that I have concerning different groups of people. It was especially interesting to examine the moderate association that I have with male career and female family. I chose to take the Young-Old and Family-Career IATs first because those were the areas that I felt the most comfortable learning about and sharing, and second because those were the areas that I felt that I knew the most about my attitudes. However, I do plan on taking additional tests, including the more controversial IATs, to further explore my unconscious beliefs.

Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.

Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436.

Newcomb, T. M. (1943). Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community. Fort worth, TX: Dryden Press.

Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166-180.

Staats, A. W., & Staats, C. K. (1958). Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 37-40.

Blog #4-stereotypes

Stereotypes, the assumptions of traits that we make about people simply based on the group in which they belong, are very common and frequently used. Although these stereotypes allow us to quickly make assumptions of people, they tend to cause us to overestimate the differences between groups and similarities within groups  (Ford & Tonander, 1998). Furthermore, once a person has formed and cemented a stereotype,  it is readily available and its influence comes easily to mind (Devine, 1996).

The time in my life that I feel that stereotypes were the most prevalent in my life was during middle school while living in Kentucky.  The county I lived in was a rural farming area where its residents hold onto their history and are resistant to change. Often, people do not move from small rural towns causing stereotypes and prejudices to be passed down through generations and remain strong. It was definitely an experience moving to a community like this especially because my family had no history or ties there. We experienced some stereotyping ourselves (moving from Hawaii made us rich no matter how many times I told my friends that my father was in the Navy and we lived on a military base), but nothing compared to the long standing stereotypes that were held of people whose families had lived there for years and years. 

There was a definite order in which people lived and unspoken rules that everyone seemed to obey. It was not unusual that if  person's name came up in conversation for people to automatically categorize them into who their family was, where they lived, and what their daddy did for a living. Based on information like this, it seemed like others made automatic assumptions about who they were and would put limits on what they could do and what they were allowed to do. For example, the side of town you lived on determined not only how wealthy your family was, but also determined how smart you were and how successful your children would be. If you were related to the judge then you were automatically seen as an upstanding, christian citizen no matter how far that relation or what trouble you got in. If you were African American it didn't matter where you lived or who you were related to as people would automatically assume that you probably would not amount to much unless you played basketball. I don't want to make it sound like where I lived in Kentucky was awful because it really wasn't. Being such a small town, it seemed like a lot of the people thought along those stereotypical lines,  but there really was a substantial group of people who genuinely wanted to get to know you for who you are and not what group you belonged to. The county school I attended, as opposed to the city school, was more diverse and people were close no matter where you were from. It was also important to my parents to make sure that my brother and I understood that stereotypes can be wrong and that we should get to know the person and not make assumptions. 

Devine, P. G. (1996). Breaking the prejudice habit. Psychological Science Agenda, 10-11

Ford, T.E., & Tonander, G. R. (1998). The role of differentiation between groups and social identity in stereotype formation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 372-384.  

Blog #3-Spotlight Effect

This example is a little middle-school corny, but here it goes. :)

The spotlight effect is the tendency for individuals to overestimate the degree to which others notice them (Gilovich & Savitsky, 1999). That is, people are egocentrically biased, or focused on themselves, and tend to believe that they somehow standout more to others than they actually do (Gilovich & Savitsky, 1999).  

My hair is naturally wavy and very frizzy; most days it takes at least blow-drying if not straightening to make it look halfway decent. It sounds silly, but I remember clearly the day in the eighth-grade that I discovered the magic of a hair-straightener. Apparently I was the only one to notice. I was a little nervous after getting up early to make my newly straightened hair just perfect for school because I was absolutely positive that people would notice. I remember being nervous when I first arrived at school and excited to get to my first class where I knew people would be looking at my new hair. Although a few friends of mine thought my hair looked nice that day, it was definitely not the enthusiastic response that my eight-grade mind was expecting. I think that I honestly thought that a spotlight would be on me that day. :)

I still fall pray to the spotlight effect, but after talking to some of my friends about it this week I feel that I'm not alone. To just see what would happen, I randomly told one of my friends (who looked exactly the same way she does everyday) that she looked different to see what she would say. She told me that she was waiting when I would bring up the fact that her new makeup looked a little much. It is always kind of funny when a friend remarks about how their hair looks that day or how their face is broken out and you look up realizing that you would never have noticed.  

Gilovich, T. & Savitsky, K. (1999). The spotlight effect and the illusion of transparency: Egocentric assessments of how we are seen by others. American Psychological Society, 8, 165-168. 

Blog #2 FAE

The fundamental attribution error occurs when an individual attributes another's behavior to their traits and personality rather than taking the situation into account (Ross, 1977). I know that I have made the fundamental attribution error several times, but the time that stands out most in my mind was the day that I met my best-friend. I had just moved to Texas and was visiting a church for the first time. It was a very small congregation and my family was immediately greeted by the pastor and his youngest daughter, Becca. Once she heard that I was new in town, Becca grabbed my arm, led me to a bench, and assaulted me with tons of questions. All of her questions and her overly bubbly personality immediately led me to believe that she was too perky and intrusive for us to ever be friends. I never paid her much attention after that and focused my attention on meeting other people and finding friends that better matched my personality. My family continued to attend that church and Becca and I were weekly church friends, but it wasn't until much later (I'm talking three years later) that we became best-friends. It was during a summer camp that I was able to sit down and spend some real quality time with her; we have been best-friends ever since. I found out later that it was her job in the youth group to take new people aside, get to know them, and then fill out a card with all of their information. My impression of her being perky and bubble was not entirely incorrect because her being an open and friendly person made her perfect for the job. I had just made some wrong assumptions and never bothered to get to know her after that. 

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press. 

Blog #1-Impressions Based on Physical Appearances

First impressions are often formed or influenced by the physical appearances of the individuals being perceived. Zebrowitz and Montepare (2005) concluded from their social perception studies of the human face that having a baby-face, or less mature features, can have a significant effect on the perceptions individuals. In addition, individuals with less mature features are perceived as being kind, naive, and weak than individuals with mature features (Berry & Zebrowitz-McArthur, 1986). Normally, people guess that I am still in high school and are surprised to find that I am in fact old enough to attend college. As an example, one of my friends (who also happens to have a baby-face) and I decided to drive to Florida last summer to visit my grandparents and go to Disney World. We stopped at a hotel after our first day of driving and as soon as the mid-thirties desk clerk took a look at me when I told her we would like to check-in, she called me honey and asked me where my parents were. Apparently it is against hotel policies to have individuals under 16 stay without parental supervision. Kind of annoyed after an eight-hour drive, I told her that I didn't know where my parents were and asked her where hers were. Once she confirmed from my driver's license that I was 20 and not 13 like she originally thought, she gave us our room key. Still not entirely over the fact that my friend and I are able to take care of ourselves, she continued to exclaim how young and innocent we looked and kept offering to give us tips on how to care for ourselves while traveling.

Having individuals form impressions of me based on the way that I look and the age that they think I am is nothing new for me. I am constantly called honey or sweetie by stewardesses and waitresses, I often receive unnecessary help at airports when traveling alone (I was once told by an older gentleman on a plane that I was just too young and fragile to be traveling alone), and I am consistently asked to work as a babysitter for church activities rather than running an event. After reading our textbook and articles I plan to be more aware of the self-fulfilling prophecy. That is, I plan to be more aware of the way that I react to the expectations that people have of me (in my case being naive and weak) so that I do not confirm their impressions and make their expectations a reality (Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1986).

Berry, D. S., & Zebrowitz-McArthur, L. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age- related craniofacial changes in social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3-18. 

Rosenthal, R. & Lenore, J. F. (1968). Teacher expectation for the disadvantaged. Scientific American, 218, 3-9.

Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2005). Appearance DOES Matter. Science, 308, 1565- 1566. 

Hey everyone :)

I guess for my welcome blog I will tell you all a little more about me and my summer. During my freshman year my dad's job transfered him to Chicago, and the following summer my parents sold their house and moved all of their stuff to Illinois. My mom is a high school math teacher and stayed at her school in Texas for an extra year because we were not sure if the house would sell before the next school year started. That same summer my brother, who is 25, decided to move to California and I got an apartment near school. It was a little crazy with everyone in different places and by the end I was pretty much done with moving. Well, it didn't last too long. My dad hated it in Chicago (I think mostly because of the weather and distance from my mom) and my mom did not want to change jobs and move yet again (my dad is retired Navy so we moved a lot when I was younger). So, this summer we had to move everything back ourselves, except my brother who is in love with California. I was able to get out of the way for the first part of the move by taking Spanish III and IV here, but the rest of the summer was devoted to driving to and back from Illinois, unpacking boxes, and painting the entire house. Not a very fun and exciting summer but since moving is nothing new and my family was able to get back together again it wasn't all that bad.